Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb 4;16(2):194.
doi: 10.3390/s16020194.

Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review

Shmuel Springer  1 , Galit Yogev Seligmann  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Validity of the Kinect for Gait Assessment: A Focused Review

Shmuel Springer et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Gait analysis may enhance clinical practice. However, its use is limited due to the need for expensive equipment which is not always available in clinical settings. Recent evidence suggests that Microsoft Kinect may provide a low cost gait analysis method. The purpose of this report is to critically evaluate the literature describing the concurrent validity of using the Kinect as a gait analysis instrument. An online search of PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases was performed. Included were studies in which walking was assessed with the Kinect and another gold standard device, and consisted of at least one numerical finding of spatiotemporal or kinematic measures. Our search identified 366 papers, from which 12 relevant studies were retrieved. The results demonstrate that the Kinect is valid only for some spatiotemporal gait parameters. Although the kinematic parameters measured by the Kinect followed the trend of the joint trajectories, they showed poor validity and large errors. In conclusion, the Kinect may have the potential to be used as a tool for measuring spatiotemporal aspects of gait, yet standardized methods should be established, and future examinations with both healthy subjects and clinical participants are required in order to integrate the Kinect as a clinical gait analysis tool.

Keywords: Kinect; gait analysis; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Barak Y., Wagenaar R.C., Holt K.G. Gait characteristics of elderly people with a history of falls: A dynamic approach. Phys. Ther. 2006;86:1501–1510. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wren T.A., Gorton G.E., Ounpuu S., Tucker C.A. Efficacy of clinical gait analysis: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2011;34:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cimolin V., Galli M. Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: A literature review. Gait Posture. 2014;39:1005–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Middleton A., Fritz S.L., Lusardi M. Walking speed: The functional vital sign. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2015;23:314–322. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark R.A., Bower K.J., Mentiplay B.F., Paterson K., Pua Y.-H. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. J. Biomech. 2013;46:2722–2725. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources