Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects
- PMID: 23547104
- DOI: 10.1167/13.5.2
Object-based saccadic selection during scene perception: evidence from viewing position effects
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to further test the hypothesis that objects are important units of saccade targeting and, by inference, attentional selection in real-world scene perception. To this end, we investigated where people fixate within objects embedded in natural scenes. Previously, we reported a preferred viewing location (PVL) close to the center of objects (Nuthmann & Henderson, 2010). Here, we qualify this basic finding by showing that the PVL is affected by object size and the distance between the object and the previous fixation (i.e., launch site distance). Moreover, we examined how within-object fixation position affected subsequent eye-movement behavior on the object. Unexpectedly, there was no refixation optimal viewing position (OVP) effect for objects in scenes. Where viewers initially placed their eyes on an object did not affect the likelihood of refixating that object, suggesting that some refixations on objects in scenes are made for reasons other than insufficient visual information. A fixation-duration inverted-optimal viewing (IOVP) effect was found for large objects: Fixations located at object center were longer than those falling near the edges of an object. Collectively, these findings lend further support to the notion of object-based saccade targeting in scenes.
Similar articles
-
Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):20. doi: 10.1167/10.8.20. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20884595
-
Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Sep;66(9):1707-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.762798. Epub 2013 Feb 11. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013. PMID: 23398283
-
Overt attention in natural scenes: objects dominate features.Vision Res. 2015 Feb;107:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25478891
-
High-level scene perception.Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:243-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999. PMID: 10074679 Review.
-
Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis.Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 May;18(5):242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014. PMID: 24630872 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Objects guide human gaze behavior in dynamic real-world scenes.PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Oct 26;19(10):e1011512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011512. eCollection 2023 Oct. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023. PMID: 37883331 Free PMC article.
-
Pseudoneglect during object search in naturalistic scenes.Exp Brain Res. 2023 Sep;241(9):2345-2360. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06679-6. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 37610677 Free PMC article.
-
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 37095319 Free PMC article.
-
Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):632-648. doi: 10.1177/17470218221101334. Epub 2022 Jun 8. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023. PMID: 35510885 Free PMC article.
-
Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):364-416. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8. Epub 2022 Apr 6. Behav Res Methods. 2023. Retraction in: Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):511-512. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02285-0. PMID: 35384605 Free PMC article. Retracted. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources