Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

David Tilman  1 , Christian Balzer, Jason Hill, Belinda L Befort
Affiliations

Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture

David Tilman et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Global food demand is increasing rapidly, as are the environmental impacts of agricultural expansion. Here, we project global demand for crop production in 2050 and evaluate the environmental impacts of alternative ways that this demand might be met. We find that per capita demand for crops, when measured as caloric or protein content of all crops combined, has been a similarly increasing function of per capita real income since 1960. This relationship forecasts a 100-110% increase in global crop demand from 2005 to 2050. Quantitative assessments show that the environmental impacts of meeting this demand depend on how global agriculture expands. If current trends of greater agricultural intensification in richer nations and greater land clearing (extensification) in poorer nations were to continue, ~1 billion ha of land would be cleared globally by 2050, with CO(2)-C equivalent greenhouse gas emissions reaching ~3 Gt y(-1) and N use ~250 Mt y(-1) by then. In contrast, if 2050 crop demand was met by moderate intensification focused on existing croplands of underyielding nations, adaptation and transfer of high-yielding technologies to these croplands, and global technological improvements, our analyses forecast land clearing of only ~0.2 billion ha, greenhouse gas emissions of ~1 Gt y(-1), and global N use of ~225 Mt y(-1). Efficient management practices could substantially lower nitrogen use. Attainment of high yields on existing croplands of underyielding nations is of great importance if global crop demand is to be met with minimal environmental impacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Annual dependence of per capita demand for (A) crop calories and (B) protein on per capita real GDP for each of economic Groups A–G (SI Materials and Methods). Each color of points shows the trajectory for a particular economic group (one point per year for each group). Curves are fitted to the square root of per capita GDP.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(A) Per capita GDP, (B) per capita demand for crop calories, and (C) per capita demand for crop protein in 2005 (black) and mean projected 2050 increases (white; percent increases above bars).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Projections of 2050 values for (A) global yields, (B) global land clearing, and (C) global agricultural GHG emissions and (D–F) the yields and environmental impacts of four alternative hypothetical trajectories along which agriculture might develop by 2050. Tonnes CO2e in (C) and (F) represents the equivalent tonnes of C that would have been emitted had all GHG emissions in our analyses been in the form of CO2. All abscissas are global annual N use in 2050 calculated as the sum across all economic groups of N use intensity (N ha−1) times total cropland area (ha) needed to meet projected 2050 caloric demand. To derive the curves shown, current N use intensities of lower-yielding nations were strategically increased to equal global mean intensity, which was set at 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, or 160 kg ha−1 to calculate the 12 points shown for each curve (SI Materials and Methods). The four curves shown in each graph (magenta, current technology; blue, improvement only; orange, technology adaptation and transfer only; green, improvement and technology transfer) are regression-based estimates of yields (A and D) and associated land clearing (B and E) needed to meet 2050 global caloric demand and resultant GHG emissions (C and F). Land clearing = (cropland needed to meet 2050 crop demand) − (2005 cropland).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Food for thought.
    Godfray HC. Godfray HC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19845-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118568109. Epub 2011 Nov 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 22123955 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

  • Managing nitrogen for sustainable development.
    Zhang X, Davidson EA, Mauzerall DL, Searchinger TD, Dumas P, Shen Y. Zhang X, et al. Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):51-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15743. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Nature. 2015. PMID: 26595273
  • Projected water consumption in future global agriculture: scenarios and related impacts.
    Pfister S, Bayer P, Koehler A, Hellweg S. Pfister S, et al. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 15;409(20):4206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 15. Sci Total Environ. 2011. PMID: 21840571
  • Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region.
    Ramirez-Contreras NE, Fontanilla-Díaz CA, Pardo LE, Delgado T, Munar-Florez D, Wicke B, Ruíz-Delgado J, van der Hilst F, Garcia-Nuñez JA, Mosquera-Montoya M, Faaij APC. Ramirez-Contreras NE, et al. J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114137. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114137. Epub 2021 Nov 27. J Environ Manage. 2022. PMID: 34847366
  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
  • The environmental impacts of palm oil in context.
    Meijaard E, Brooks TM, Carlson KM, Slade EM, Garcia-Ulloa J, Gaveau DLA, Lee JSH, Santika T, Juffe-Bignoli D, Struebig MJ, Wich SA, Ancrenaz M, Koh LP, Zamira N, Abrams JF, Prins HHT, Sendashonga CN, Murdiyarso D, Furumo PR, Macfarlane N, Hoffmann R, Persio M, Descals A, Szantoi Z, Sheil D. Meijaard E, et al. Nat Plants. 2020 Dec;6(12):1418-1426. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00813-w. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Nat Plants. 2020. PMID: 33299148 Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Godfray HCJ, et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science. 2010;327:812–818. - PubMed
    1. The Government Office for Science . Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming. Final Project Report. London: The Government Office for Science; 2011.
    1. Dirzo R, Raven PH. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2003;28:137–167.
    1. Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:12052–12057. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitousek PM, et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle. Ecol Appl. 1997;7:737–750.

Publication types