On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect
- PMID: 2200075
- DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332
On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect
Abstract
Traditional views of automaticity are in need of revision. For example, automaticity often has been treated as an all-or-none phenomenon, and traditional theories have held that automatic processes are independent of attention. Yet recent empirical data suggest that automatic processes are continuous, and furthermore are subject to attentional control. A model of attention is presented to address these issues. Within a parallel distributed processing framework, it is proposed that the attributes of automaticity depend on the strength of a processing pathway and that strength increases with training. With the Stroop effect as an example, automatic processes are shown to be continuous and to emerge gradually with practice. Specifically, a computational model of the Stroop task simulates the time course of processing as well as the effects of learning. This was accomplished by combining the cascade mechanism described by McClelland (1979) with the backpropagation learning algorithm (Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams, 1986). The model can simulate performance in the standard Stroop task, as well as aspects of performance in variants of this task that manipulate stimulus-onset asynchrony, response set, and degree of practice. The model presented is contrasted against other models, and its relation to many of the central issues in the literature on attention, automaticity, and interference is discussed.
Similar articles
-
A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity.Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):239-69. Am J Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1621882
-
Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):317-39. Am J Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1621884
-
Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):727-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03202722. Mem Cognit. 1992. PMID: 1435275
-
The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3. Psychol Bull. 1996. PMID: 8711015 Review.
-
Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: A theoretical analysis and new empirical findings.Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):721-733. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 27714665 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of attentional control on stimulus processing is category specific in Stroop tasks : Attentional control.Psychol Res. 2013 Sep;77(5):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0457-5. Epub 2012 Oct 19. Psychol Res. 2013. PMID: 23080057
-
Resting-state BOLD signal variability is associated with individual differences in metacontrol.Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21703-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36319653 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous eyeblinks are correlated with responses during the Stroop task.PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034871. Epub 2012 Apr 6. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22493720 Free PMC article.
-
Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging.Psychol Aging. 2015 Mar;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/pag0000012. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Psychol Aging. 2015. PMID: 25602489 Free PMC article.
-
Time discounting for primary rewards.J Neurosci. 2007 May 23;27(21):5796-804. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4246-06.2007. J Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17522323 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources