How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Sep;11(9):393-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought

Gerald L Clore  1 , Jeffrey R Huntsinger
Affiliations
Review

How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought

Gerald L Clore et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Being happy or sad influences the content and style of thought. One explanation is that affect serves as information about the value of whatever comes to mind. Thus, when a person makes evaluative judgments or engages in a task, positive affect can enhance evaluations and empower potential responses. Rather than affect itself, the information conveyed by affect is crucial. Tests of the hypothesis find that affective influences can be made to disappear by changing the source to which the affect is attributed. In tasks, positive affect validates and negative affect invalidates accessible cognitions, leading to relational processing and item-specific processing, respectively. Positive affect is found to promote, and negative affect to inhibit, many textbook phenomena from cognitive psychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of serial reproductions of a drawing from memory showing that the schema of a face guides the construction of memory. In 1932, Frederick Bartlett [58] showed students a drawing of an African shield, and asked them to draw it from memory. He gave their drawings to others, asking them to reproduce the drawings from memory; these drawings were then reproduced from memory by a third group, and so on. The drawing bore the title ‘Portrait d’homme’, and reproductions of it gradually began to look more like a portrait of a man and less like an African shield, as shown above. The schema of a face suggested by the title guided people’s memories, illustrating Bartlett’s theory of constructive memory. This classic experiment has been recently repeated with the addition of mood [22]. Blind ratings of the drawings that resulted showed that those reproduced by individuals in happy moods were more face-like than those reproduced in sad moods. Positive affect thus seems to promote the use of accessible schemas, whereas negative affect inhibits their use, leading to more local, stimulus-bound processing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Global–local perception experiment. (a) Respondents indicate, in each of 24 trials, the comparison picture (bottom) with which the target picture (top) goes. In this instance, if participants base their similarity judgment on global features, they would say that the comparison picture with the overall shape of a triangle is more similar to the target picture. If they base their similarity judgments on local features, they would choose the comparison picture in which the component elements are squares. Sample trial taken from Ref. [23]. (b) Results show a more global focus for happy and neutral than for sad mood groups. Data taken from Ref. [22].
Figure 3
Figure 3
False memory experiment. Thirty-six word lists, each comprising words highly associated with a non-presented lure, are presented. Relational processing of happy and control groups results in the false recall of many lures, whereas item-specific processing in sad moods was more accurate. Figure based on Ref. [44].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. McLemee S. Getting emotional. Chron. Higher Ed. 2003;49:A14.
    1. Schwarz N, Clore GL. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski K, editors. Social Psychology. A Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd edn. Guilford Press; 2007. pp. 385–407.
    1. Yeung CWM, Wyer RS., Jr Affect, appraisal, and consumer judgment. J. Consum. Res. 2004;31:412–424.
    1. Schwarz N, Clore GL. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1983;45:513–523.
    1. Clore G, et al. Affective feelings as feedback: some cognitive consequences. In: Martin LL, Clore GL, editors. Theories of Mood and Cognition: A User’s Guidebook. Erlbaum; 2001. pp. 63–84.

Publication types