Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization
- PMID: 17057064
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2412051710
Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively examine operator dependence of lesion detection, description, and interpretation when experienced breast radiologists perform whole-breast ultrasonography (US).
Materials and methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for the HIPAA-compliant study. Ten women (aged 19-53 years; mean, 37.4 years; 20 breasts) with numerous known breast lesions consented to participate. Eleven breast radiologists, who passed experience and qualification requirements for a screening breast US trial and consented to participate, scanned both breasts in all participants and documented images of each detected lesion and its size, location, features, palpability, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System final assessment. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure agreement on lesion size and location, and kappa statistics were calculated for agreement on features and final assessments compared with consensus.
Results: Eighty-eight unique lesions were identified by at least two investigators (five to 13 lesions per participant). Mean diameter was 6.7 mm (standard error, 0.4; range, 2-22 mm), and eight lesions (9%) were palpable. Of 968 potential detections (88 lesions, 11 investigators), 536 (55%) detections were made. Individual investigators detected between 43 (49%) and 58 (66%) lesions. Larger lesions were more consistently detected: Detection rates were six of 33 lesions (18%) at 3 mm or smaller; 164 of 374 (43.9%) at 3.1-5 mm; 145 of 275 (52.7%) at 5.1-7 mm; 119 of 176 (67.6%) at 7.1-9 mm; 38 of 44 (86%) at 9.1-11 mm; and 64 of 66 (97%) lesions larger than 11 mm (P < .001). ICCs for clockface, distance from nipple, and individual lesion diameter all exceeded 0.7, indicating high reliability. For shape, margins, and final assessments of solid lesions, kappa values were 0.62, 0.67 (substantial agreement), and 0.52 (moderate agreement), respectively. Of 110 detections of consensus cysts 8 mm and smaller, 15 (14%) detections were considered to be of solid lesions by at least one reader.
Conclusion: Larger lesions (>11 mm) are most consistently detected, with fewer than half of lesions 5 mm or smaller in mean diameter identified; substantial agreement was found for description of lesion size, location, and key features, and moderate agreement was found for lesion management.
Similar articles
-
Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators.Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):693-702. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393051069. Epub 2006 Apr 26. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 16641344
-
Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Sep;197(3):747-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5841. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21862820
-
Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.Acta Radiol. 2015 Oct;56(10):1163-70. doi: 10.1177/0284185114551565. Epub 2014 Oct 3. Acta Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25280476
-
Ultrasound in the management of breast disease.Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr;3(2):156-64. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003. PMID: 12628086 Review.
-
Review of complex breast cysts: implications for cancer detection and clinical practice.ANZ J Surg. 2005 Dec;75(12):1080-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03608.x. ANZ J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16398815 Review.
Cited by
-
Does formal instruction about the BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon result in improved appropriate use of the lexicon?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):456-61. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10157. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013. PMID: 23883229 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of radiologists' findings by computer-aided detection (CAD) software in breast cancer detection with automated 3D breast ultrasound: a concept study in implementation of artificial intelligence software.Acta Radiol. 2020 Mar;61(3):312-320. doi: 10.1177/0284185119858051. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Acta Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31324132 Free PMC article.
-
Should We Ignore, Follow, or Biopsy? Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support on Breast Ultrasound Lesion Assessment.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jun;214(6):1445-1452. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21872. Epub 2020 Apr 22. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32319794 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasonography.Ultrasonography. 2021 Apr;40(2):183-190. doi: 10.14366/usg.20117. Epub 2020 Nov 12. Ultrasonography. 2021. PMID: 33430577 Free PMC article.
-
Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):224-35. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7324. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012. PMID: 22733916 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical