The influence of motion signals in hand movements | Experimental Brain Research Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The influence of motion signals in hand movements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

It has been shown that motion after-effects (MAE) may affect the perceived position of moving objects and, more recently, that MAE signals can also affect pursuit eye movements: smooth pursuit eye movements are favoured by the illusory motion percept that is caused by motion adaptation. Here we investigated the relationship between MAE and arm movements. The objective of our research was: (1) to analyze possible effects of MAE when the arm tracks the changing position of a moving object, and (2) to investigate the influence of MAE on pointing movements to both static and moving targets. Our results show that the (unseen) hand position was trailing the target much less when target and MAE direction was the same. At the end of manual pursuit, subjects caught up with the moving target. However, when target direction was opposite the MAE, subjects’ hands moved more slowly, causing larger lags between the target and the hand position (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we found a similar effect of motion signals when subjects pointed to a moving target but found no effect of MAE when pointing to a static object (Experiment 3). We conclude that the effect of motion signals is only revealed when we need to update the changing position of a target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bairstow PJ (1987) Analysis of hand movement to moving targets. Hum Mov Sci 6:205–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 51:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson P, Boons JP (1960) Time uncertainty and choice reaction time. Nature 187:531–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braun DI, Pracejus L, Gegenfurtner KR (2006) Motion aftereffect elicits smooth pursuit eye movements. J Vis 6:671–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner E, Smeets JB (1997) Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J Motion Behav 29(4):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A (1981) Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel KC, Anderson JH, Soechting F (2000) Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion. J Neurophysiol 84:1149–1156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomi H, Abekawa N, Nishida S (2006) Spatiotemporal tuning of rapid interactions between visual-motion analysis and reaching movement. J Neurosci 26:5301–5308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory RL (1966) Eye and Brain. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda H (1990) The extraretinal signal from the pursuit-eye-movement system: its role in the perceptual and the egocentric localization systems. Percept Psychophys 48:509–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linares D, López-Moliner J, Johnston A (2007) Motion signal and the perceived positions of moving objects. J Vis 7(7):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus GR, Masson MEJ (1994) Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon Bull Rev 1:476–490

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Moliner J, Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2004) Components of motion perception revealed: two different after-effects from a single moving object. Vis Res 44:2545–2549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maioli C, Falciati L, Gianesini T (2007) Pursuit eye movements involve a covert motor plan for manual tracking. J Neurosci 27:7168–7173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrani L, Dimitrov G (1982) Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement. Vis Res 22(8):1047–1051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama K (1985) Biological image motion processing: a review. Vis Res 25:625–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhawan R (1994) Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370:256–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida S, Johnston A (1999) Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397:610–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saijo N, Murakami I, Nishida S, Gomi H (2005) Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response. J Neurosci 25:4941–4951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M (2002) Through the eye, slowly: Delays and localization errors in visual system. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:191–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (1995) Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:19–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JBJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers RJ, Brenner E (2006) Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:18781–18786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden RJ (1998) Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Curr Biol 8:1343–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden RJ, Milne AB (1997) Phantom motion aftereffects - evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow. Curr Biol 7:717–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, van der Gon JJD (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122:367–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P (2001) Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 85:1914–1922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watamaniuk SNJ, Heinen SJ (2007) Storage of an oculomotor motion aftereffect. Vis Res 47:466–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker D, McGraw PV, Pearson S (1999) Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting ob jects. Vis Res 39:2999–3009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney D (2002) The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends Cogn Sci 6(5):211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney D, Cavanagh P (2000) Motion distorts visual space: shitfting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nat Neurosci 3:954–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney D, Cavanagh P (2003) Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect. Percept Psychophys 65:1011–1018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney D, Goodale M (2005) Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand. J Vis 162:394–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney D, Ellison A, Rice NJ, Arnold D, Goodale M, Walsh V, Milner D (2007) Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+. Cereb Cortex 17:2644–2649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmer JB, Nakayama K (2007) Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: Evidence form individual differences. Neuron 54:987–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright MJ (1986) Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. Perception 15:603–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi N, Anderson SJ, Ashida H (2001) Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans. Proc R Soc Lond 268:973–977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. This work has been supported by European Science Foundation, Eurocores 06-CNCC-FP-012 grant, and Grant SEJ2006-27544-E from the Spanish Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grup d’Atenció, Acció i Percepció, GRNC, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Borja Rodríguez-Herreros & Joan López-Moliner

  2. Faculty of Psychology, P. Vall d’Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

    Joan López-Moliner

Authors
  1. Borja Rodríguez-Herreros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joan López-Moliner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan López-Moliner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Herreros, B., López-Moliner, J. The influence of motion signals in hand movements. Exp Brain Res 191, 321–329 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1527-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1527-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation